← Founder Notes
Archive

The storm at sea is now being asked to issue its own notice

Yethikrishna ROriginal on Threads

the storm at sea is now being asked to issue its own notice: deepmind’s weathernext predicts cyclone track intensity and wind structure three days out as well as older models did in two, an ai correction on ecmwf’s forecast matches operational skill on peak winds and central pressure, and a partnership with noaa is turning cyclone archives into a machine ready database.

the eye now files its own outlook.

Context

Google DeepMind's blog (August 6, 2026) says a Nature paper shows WeatherNext reached state-of-the-art accuracy on cyclone track, intensity and wind structure. On average its three-day forecasts are as good as what prior models gave for the next two days, which it compares to about a decade of meteorological progress. It says the model helped the National Hurricane Center with Hurricane Melissa's rapid intensification in 2025, now predicts 1,000 scenarios per cyclone, and is being open sourced.

ECMWF's blog (August 3, 2026) describes AIFS-TC. A second machine-learning system learns the intensity errors of the existing AIFS forecast and corrects them, using the predicted track, intensity and 3D fields around the storm. On 2025 season storms not used in training, ECMWF says it is comparable to leading operational guidance and to AI state-of-the-art systems for maximum wind speed and minimum central pressure.

NOAA's Technology Partnerships Office (July 8, 2025) says the National Hurricane Center and Google are teaming up so NHC can quickly evaluate Google's new AI tropical model and give feedback.

How it compares

The first two items match the note. The 'three days as well as older models did in two' is DeepMind's own wording about its own results, and the figure is an average across storms in a vendor blog backed by a Nature paper. The AIFS-TC claim is 'comparable' to the leading systems, not better, and ECMWF's own test used the 2025 season only. The note's third item, 'turning cyclone archives into a machine ready database', could not be matched: the NOAA partnership page read describes model evaluation and feedback and does not mention a database. That part is unsupported here, not refuted. Also, the note joins a Google model, an ECMWF correction and a NOAA partnership that are separate efforts.

Related work

Watch next

  • Find the source for the machine ready cyclone database claim, if there is one. Compare WeatherNext Cyclones and AIFS-TC on the same storms and metrics.

Sources

  1. WeatherNext: AI model achieves breakthrough in forecasting cyclones (Google DeepMind blog)deepmind.google
  2. Improving tropical cyclone intensity forecasts with a simple AI correction (ECMWF)ecmwf.int
  3. NOAA and Google team up to advance the use of AI hurricane and tropical weather forecast models (NOAA Technology Partnerships Office)techpartnerships.noaa.gov

Provenance

The note above is reproduced unedited from the original post, first published on Threads on 4 October 2026 at 00:48 IST. Sources are the papers and datasets the note draws on.

View the original post
Embed this note
<iframe src="https://founder.myndlabs.tech/notes/embed/the-storm-at-sea-is-now-being-asked-DeCyxJxgJw3" width="480" height="420" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy" title="The storm at sea is now being asked to issue its own notice"></iframe>

More notes