← Founder Notes
Archive

The snowstorm is now being asked to keep its own forecast

Yethikrishna ROriginal on Threads

the snowstorm is now being asked to keep its own forecast: google’s weathernext 3 reads a live mosaic of geostationary satellites and claims 50 percent more accurate precipitation, a hybrid net called reppic net reads rain versus snow phase in real time against a four hour lag, and amsr 2 retrievals checked against icesat 2 measure snow depth to within 8 centimeters.

the storm now files its own snowfall total.

Context

Google DeepMind's blog (September 3, 2026) says WeatherNext 3 ingests live geostationary satellite data, refreshes every hour at up to 5 km, and was trained on NASA IMERG and a satellite radar based precipitation reanalysis. For medium-range global forecasts it reports a Continuous Ranked Probability Score improvement of up to 60% against IMERG and 30% for MRMS, versus baselines. The arXiv paper says it forecasts hourly at 0.1 degree for single-level variables.

RePPIC-Net (Nature Communications, 2026) combines FuXi's AI-driven 3D atmospheric fields with operational geostationary satellite data to retrieve surface precipitation phase in real time, against at least 4 hours of latency for current operational products. Against ground stations in China it reports a CSI of 0.1574 for snowfall and 0.3147 for rainfall at 0.1 to 5 mm per hour, against 0.1001 and 0.3064 for the 4-hour products.

The snow depth paper (Frontiers in Remote Sensing, 2025) trains a neural network on ICESat-2 snow depth to retrieve Arctic sea ice snow depth from AMSR-2 microwave data plus humidity and temperature. Against independent ICESat-2 data it reports near-zero bias and an RMSE of 10 cm, with 9 cm for instantaneous matchups.

How it compares

The note says WeatherNext 3 'claims 50 percent more accurate precipitation'. The blog text read gives CRPS improvements of up to 60% against IMERG and 30% for MRMS, so a flat 50 percent figure is unsupported here, not refuted, and the numbers are the vendor's. RePPIC-Net's snowfall CSI of 0.1574 is a low absolute score, with a clear gain over the 4-hour product mostly for snow (0.1001 to 0.1574) and a small gain for rain (0.3064 to 0.3147). The note's 'within 8 centimeters' for snow depth does not match: the paper reports RMSE of 9 to 10 cm, and it covers Arctic sea ice only, not general snowfall totals. Each is a separate system with a different region and metric.

Related work

Watch next

  • Find where a 50 percent precipitation figure comes from, if anywhere. Check whether any AMSR-2 snow depth work reports an 8 cm error.

Sources

  1. WeatherNext 3: Our most advanced global weather AI model (Google DeepMind blog)blog.google
  2. Snow or rain? hybrid AI deciphers surface precipitation phase from satellite observations (Nature Communications)nature.com
  3. Neural network-based snow depth retrieval from AMSR-2 (Frontiers in Remote Sensing)frontiersin.org

Provenance

The note above is reproduced unedited from the original post, first published on Threads on 3 October 2026 at 23:17 IST. Sources are the papers and datasets the note draws on.

View the original post
Embed this note
<iframe src="https://founder.myndlabs.tech/notes/embed/the-snowstorm-is-now-being-asked-to-keep-DeCoSIXDMdk" width="480" height="420" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy" title="The snowstorm is now being asked to keep its own forecast"></iframe>

More notes