← Founder Notes
Archive

The sea is now being asked to read its own acidity

Yethikrishna ROriginal on Threads

the sea is now being asked to read its own acidity: a machine learning model maps pco2 and ph across the canary basin from satellites and ferry sensors, a neural net with lidar inputs reconstructs global day and night air sea co2 flux, and a six method ensemble estimates surface pco2 for the whole ocean.

the water now files its own chemistry report.

Context

The Canary Islands paper (Ocean Science, 2026) trains models on moored buoy and ship data from 2019 to 2024 to estimate seawater pCO2 and pH from satellite measurements. The best model, bootstrap aggregation, reaches an RMSE of 2.0 microatmospheres (R squared above 0.99) for pCO2 and 0.002 for pH. It finds pCO2 rising 3.51 plus or minus 0.31 microatmospheres a year, faster than the atmosphere's 2.3, and a pH trend of -0.003 plus or minus 0.001 a year. The region moved from a weak CO2 source in 2019 to a larger source by 2024.

The lidar paper (Ifremer Archimer record) uses spaceborne LiDAR data, which gives continuous day and night coverage, to estimate global ocean CO2 uptake over 23 years. Its model reproduced sea surface pCO2 data, and it reports that total CO2 absorbed by the oceans is higher at night than during the day.

CSIR-ML6 (Geoscientific Model Development, 2019) is an average of six machine-learning models for surface ocean pCO2 gap filling. On a separate test set it has an RMSE of 17.16 microatmospheres and bias of 0.89, but when checked against independent datasets the authors find it only improves incrementally on other methods.

How it compares

The Canary model's very low RMSE is for one region with a dense buoy and ship record, and the training and validation years overlap, so it says little about open ocean elsewhere. The note says the neural net 'with lidar inputs' reconstructs air-sea flux. The record read says the method uses spaceborne LiDAR and a model that reproduced pCO2, and the abstract text read does not name a neural network, so that detail is unconfirmed here. The six-method ensemble is a 2019 paper, not a new result, and its own authors say it hits a limit: RMSE 17.16 on the test set, with only incremental gains on independent data. The note's 'for the whole ocean' fits the gap filling aim, but the three pieces differ widely in error, scale and age.

Related work

Watch next

  • Read the lidar paper for the model type and validation error. Compare the Canary RMSE with a regional product on the same period.

Sources

  1. Modelling seawater pCO2 and pH in the Canary Islands region based on satellite measurements and machine learning techniques (Ocean Science)os.copernicus.org
  2. Diurnal global ocean surface pCO2 and air-sea CO2 flux reconstructed from spaceborne LiDAR data (Ifremer Archimer)archimer.ifremer.fr
  3. A comparative assessment of the uncertainties of global surface ocean CO2 estimates using a machine-learning ensemble (CSIR-ML6 version 2019a): have we hit the wall? (Geoscientific Model Development)gmd.copernicus.org

Provenance

The note above is reproduced unedited from the original post, first published on Threads on 3 October 2026 at 23:36 IST. Sources are the papers and datasets the note draws on.

View the original post
Embed this note
<iframe src="https://founder.myndlabs.tech/notes/embed/the-sea-is-now-being-asked-to-read-DeCqc-wkfF6" width="480" height="420" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy" title="The sea is now being asked to read its own acidity"></iframe>

More notes