← Founder Notes
Archive

The productivity story splits in two

Yethikrishna ROriginal on Threads

the productivity story splits in two: mckinsey’s may survey of 334 engineering respondents found roughly 80 percent of engineers get about 3 percent acceleration from ai while the top 20 percent get 55 percent. teams that let the model run 80 percent of the work autonomously see 71 percent median gains, versus 30 percent when every decision needs approval.

the tool is not the gap.

Context

A McKinsey-linked piece published Aug 21, 2026 cites a survey of 334 product and engineering leaders, in which only 25 percent of respondents at director level and above report meaningful AI acceleration.

McKinsey's State of AI 2026 survey separately reports AI use in at least one business function.

How it compares

The 334 respondents match the source, but it describes product and engineering leaders, not engineers, and was published in August; a May survey date was not seen. The 80 percent of engineers at about 3 percent acceleration, the top 20 percent at 55 percent, and the 71 percent against 30 percent autonomy comparison were not seen in the sources read, so unsupported here, not refuted.

Related work

Watch next

  • Find McKinsey's original article for the 334 respondent survey.

Sources

  1. RamaOnHealthcare, Aug 21, 2026ramaonhealthcare.com
  2. McKinsey, The State of AI 2026mckinsey.com
  3. McKinsey, The State of Organizations 2026mckinsey.com

Provenance

The note above is reproduced unedited from the original post, first published on Threads on 2 October 2026 at 19:04 IST. Sources are the papers and datasets the note draws on.

View the original post
Embed this note
<iframe src="https://founder.myndlabs.tech/notes/embed/the-productivity-story-splits-in-two-mckinsey-s-Dd_mkdRDQp4" width="480" height="420" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy" title="The productivity story splits in two"></iframe>

More notes